Showing posts with label cherie chung chor hung. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cherie chung chor hung. Show all posts

Monday, February 11, 2013

New Theme, Currency Realignment


You know you will be trying to stop a moving train when G20 issues statements such as "we must avoid currency devaluations". Already, Japan has started to climb out of a coma and they saw immediate benefits in the stock market and more importantly money started to flow again. The contraction recession in Japan has been strangling the economy for more than 20 years. Finally, first time in my career I see them doing something effective. To think that I started my career at Nomura Securities, the biggest broker in the world then, it has certainly come full circle. 

What does currency realignment mean? Once a major currency realigns, it will attract a lot of dissension from other trading partners competing in the same grouping. Just when the euro seems to have found the elixir to rebound from a sustained weakness, now comes the yen's weakness. The two main partners to complain would be the US and EU, especially at the top of the production and manufacturing chain. Autos and electrical products manufacturers are the most directly affected.
Even major trading partners exporting to Japan will be complaining on the currency shift, but all will good. We need the realignment, we need money to move, we need to rebalance intra-competitiveness for a vibrant global economy. 
So how will it affect markets? In the initial phase, it will boost the country directly benefiting from the devaluation, in this case Japan. Already now, I am certain that the US does not want the yen to drop any further, but it will and that will cause the USD to weaken a little as well. This will also cause the euro to die on its strengthening bid. The secondary phase is that it will benefit all markets as devaluation brings forth more compelling valuations and inflow of funds to buy stocks. Capital flows will also move to rebalance and invest in countries whose currency are strengthening as a safe haven or to ride on the currency, but they will not benefit as much as the devalued countries.
Having said that, it should be a very vibrant and bullish 3 months ahead (except for Malaysia with its elections) as it won't be a totally zero sum game. Can all markets gain at the same time? Yes because there has been too much money and liquidity pumped into the system and the bulk of it is still residing in bonds and money market. The shifts in currency valuations, and the fierce pronouncement by Federal Reserve in keeping liquidity ample for quite a long time, and the willingness of the new regime in Japan to weaken the yen, plus the superhero feats by Draghi to drag the euro from oblivion to safety by "hope and prayer" alone ... all points to super bullish trend in global equities.
-----------------------------------------------
from Bloomberg:
The Group of 20 nations must avoid currency devaluations aimed at increasing competitiveness and promote more transparency in exchange rates, the U.S. Treasury Department’s top international official said.
“The G-20 needs to deliver on the commitment to move to market-determined exchange rates and refrain from competitive devaluation,” Lael Brainard, the Treasury’s undersecretary for international affairs, said at a news conference in Washington today. Brainard said “global growth is weak and vulnerable to the downside,” and strengthening demand must be a top priority for G-20 finance ministers and central bankers meeting in Moscow Feb. 15-16.
Lael Brainard, under secretary of the Treasury for international affairs, said she supports the effort in Japan to end deflation and “reinvigorate growth. It will be important that structural reforms accompany macroeconomic policies to achieve these goals.” Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
Brainard said she supports the effort in Japan to end deflation and “reinvigorate growth. It will be important that structural reforms accompany macroeconomic policies to achieve these goals.”
The Group of Seven nations are considering saying they won’t target exchange rates when setting policy as they try to calm concern that the world is on the brink of a so-called currency war, two officials from G-7 countries said.

Exchange Rates

Finance officials from the world’s key industrial economies have drafted a statement on currencies now being reviewed by senior policy makers, they said on condition of anonymity. The current wording, which still may be changed, combines the traditional backing for market-set exchange rates with a new line that governments don’t direct fiscal or monetary policy at driving currencies, one aide said.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s push for more aggressive monetary policy has raised concern abroad that his government is directly seeking to weaken the yen, something it denies.
Japan has been criticized for driving down the yen by officials from South Korea to Russia in the run-up to the G-20 meeting. Abe administration officials have said that they are focused on ending deflation, rather than seeking a specific level for the yen.
Haruhiko Kuroda, the head of the Asian Development Bank and a potential contender for Bank of Japan chief, said in an interview that the BOJ could usher in a growth spurt unseen in a generation by stepping up stimulus and ending deflation.

Currency Policies

Brainard, when asked whether the G-7 will release a statement on currency polices, said the group remains in close communication and she expects its members “will continue to adhere to the longstanding agreements that we have.” Those accords “importantly include a commitment to floating exchange rates, with very rare exceptions in cases that excess volatility or disorderly movements might warrant cooperation,” she said.
Brainard, who will attend the Moscow meetings, said China needs to “further boost household demand and reinvigorate the move to a market-determined exchange rate and interest rates.” She also said it’s important for Europe “to come together around a joint strategy that supports growth.”

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Value Traps & NTA Plays


Following Inch Kenneth meteoric surge, some readers have been so kind to send me emails about other great value stocks, e.g. Landmarks, Selangor Dredging, etc ... Dear all, stocks that trade at massive discounts are aplenty. You cannot just point to any one and say that's a good investment. It has a lot to do with proper usage of capital by investors. Why lock up your capital in a non performing great asset? The key is there must be a CATALYST to unlock value, something must be happening to unlock that value.




Those who have been in the markets long enough will understand the term "value trap". It is when you buy and hold something for the longest time because there is great inherent value. However the investor does not know when will the hidden values be unlock by management and/or owners. 

Hence investors who are wiser will always bear in mind the "value trap", being locked into something for the longest time, sometimes years. Let's look at: 

Kuchai Development 

Its basically a holding company. Its got a substantial stake of 26% in palm oil Sg Bagan and a highly attractive 3m shares of Great Eastern (traded now btw S$15-16). All in the total net asset value for Kuchai Development is around RM260m. It has 120.7m shares (50 sen), which makes for a NAV of RM2.47. Guess what's the share price??? Its just 1.20. How to go wrong?

Technically you have to outlive the owners or wait till they finally decide to do something with their shares. When looking at a value company, the first thing to check is the shareholdings level. For Kuchai: 

Kluang Rubber 41.9% 
Sg Bagan 9.38% 
Lee Foundation 4.18% 
Kota Trading 1.77% 



The top 3 are basically the same group of people and they made doubly sure they have more than 50% as that will stop anyone thinking of raiding the company. So if someone comes along and collect shares and then make a G.O. at RM1.60, he/she will not succeed as long as the controlling shareholders do not sell. They will probably sell if someone comes along and offer a substantive premium to NAV, say RM2.60-2.80 or thereabouts. The value is in the NAV and then the listing vehicle as a value add. 

Once the owner controls more than 50%, there's very little you can do. If you can locate a value company and there is ample free float, plus the controlling shareholder holds less than 35%, then I bet you that many vultures will be circling to take over the company, thus narrowing the gap between NAV and the share price.

It might be OK to hold on forever if the company pays a decent dividend, but in Kuchai's case it paid 0.8 sen in 2008 and 0.45 sen in 2009. If you take the share price of 80 sen  then, that works out to be a paltry dividend yield of 1% and 0.56%. Really no incentive to own this stock.


Stock               Share Price / NAV
Minho                 0.54 / 2.67
Mitrajaya            0.44 / 0.79
Pasdec                0.32 / 1.81
Advance Synergy  0.15 / 0.89
Majuperak           0.28 / 1.23
Eupe                   0.57 / 1.99
Focal Aims           0.37 / 1.17
Xian Leng            0.31 / 0.91
PW Cons             0.45 / 2.10
BCB                   0.40 / 1.69
Ekowood             0.18 / 0.73
Kia Lim               0.34 / 1.08
Prinsiptek            0.22 / 1.00
Rex Industry        0.62 / 1.92
KPSC                  0.39 / 1.26
Mycron Steel        0.34 / 1.43
Jerasia Capital     0.56 / 1.44
Cymao                0.31 / 1.47


I can go on and on ... for another 100 more at least ...



CAVEATS

These are not recommendations at all, just to highlight those with massive discounts to NTA. Besides the discount, one must look at a few things:
a) the quality of assets under its NTA, whether they are readily realisable or industry specific sunk cost (e.g. steel mills)
b) the real burn rate of an imploding company, many companies with discounts are because investors are dumping stocks of a deteriorating company which will be making significant amount of losses over the next few years just by hanging around, an imploding business model (let's not mention names la) .... then the discount is actually JUSTIFIED
c) there are material litigation which may cause future losses and liabilities



Dear SC & Bursa: I really think that there is a strong case for the SC and Bursa to come down hard on Kuchai because it does not resemble a normal company with on-going businesses. Its strictly a holding company. It does NOT allow shareholders to participate in the growth of the company, it just holds the stakes forever. It does NOTHING to extract value from their inherent value. 

To me, its like a company which has sold all businesses and sits on cash. In this case, the cash is the assets. Yes, we are treading on uncharted waters here when I advocate that SC & Bursa put in a proactive move to reinvigorate stocks like Kuchai ... but we can certainly draw up some stringent parameters, and if they are long drawn out inactive management presiding over deep value assets ... then issue a GOOD no-UMA, further inaction give them a delisting notice. We already have rules that forces companies to have a decent free float, we have rules that prohibits a company from sitting on cash forever, rules that warn companies if they are too inactive in volume traded ... all wanting a properly regularised market place to safeguard investors. Companies like Kuchai makes a mockery of being a listed company.

For companies like Kuchai, I would suggest that they need to sell down their company from above 50% effective stake to below 40% within 2 years, and then to below 35% within 4 years. One, it makes for better liquidity, two... it puts the company in play, three ... the owners will finally do something to extract value instead of doing nothing. Sounds like a great idea but will never get passed for being too radical. Still, worth thinking about it than doing nothing.

Some may say so is Berkshire Hathaway - in Buffett's case, he actively manages his positions, positions will be sold once they reach above fair value and vice versa. Kuchai's position makes a mockery of being a listed counter - anyone in their right mind would be 100x better off to invest directly into Great Eastern or Sg Bagan - there is absolutely no value to its existence.



Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Super-Investor's Latest Picks

Mr. Koon Yew Yin has kindly sent an article for me to share with you readers. Cannot get in mainstream media or research houses, you know. Money cannot buy. I have been saving for a good posting to feature Cherie Chung, her recent photos, she's 51 you know, still beautiful as ever and effervescent.
My one and only criterion for buying shares

Koon Yew Yin, 20th July 2011

As you know, there are many investment books written about the methods used by Gurus, like Warren Buffet, Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch and many others. After reading and mastering all the basic fundamentals on share selections, I thought I could make money from the stock market. It is not so easy. After learning from my own mistakes, now I have one and only one criterion for stock selection, that is to buy only shares that have profit growth prospect.


http://miracle.myftp.org/blog/2009-06-25a.jpg

I will never buy any share if I am not sure that it will make more profit in the next few quarters and also better profit this year than last year. Of course you should only buy the shares with P/E ratio below the average P/E of the sector and when the increased profit is announced you the shares you have bought will look cheap.

If you look at the first quarter results of plantation stocks, you will notice that almost all of them have made more profit than the corresponding quarter of last year. Moreover, you can see that the average selling price of CPO was around Rm 2,600 per ton and average CPO price has been above Rm 3,000 for this year. You can also see in the Star daily that the CPO price for the next few months is above Rm 3,100 per ton. Basing on these information you can safely assume that almost all plantation companies will make more profit this year than last year.


http://i0.sinaimg.cn/ent/s/h/2009-06-24/1245808720_16449c.jpg

Now you can be almost sure that you will make money if you buy planation shares. Of course, the best buy would be those with low P/E ratio which you can see in the Star or NSTP daily.

I am obliged to tell you that plantation stocks form a significant portion of my investment portfolio. I am not asking you to buy plantation shares. But if you decide to buy, you are buying at your own risk and I am not responsible of your profit or loss.

Good luck! LUCK is when preparation meets opportunity.





NOTE: The above opinion is not an invitation to buy or sell. It serves as a blogging activity of my investing thoughts and ideas, this does not represent an investment advisory service as I charge no subscription or management fees (donations are welcomed though). The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument. The ideas expressed are solely the opinions of the author. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or commentary on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.


Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites